|
|
|
|
|
Today at 5:37:18 AM(UTC)
by
pendragon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today at 1:54:43 AM(UTC)
by
eddycadub
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today at 12:38:00 AM(UTC)
by
FlogzDog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday at 10:38:01 PM(UTC)
by
Airstripp…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday at 10:36:09 PM(UTC)
by
Airstripp…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday at 10:07:44 PM(UTC)
by
Daponk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday at 9:03:16 PM(UTC)
by
Amea111
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Moderators
Posts: 5 042
Thanks: 66 times Was thanked: 146 time(s) in 111 post(s)
|
pokertuber wrote:I thought it was pretty common knowledge that HU poker with 10BB was effectively a solved game? I think bear has missed a key point. To him, he sees a shove and makes a comment such as "they are taking the skill out of the game".
The correct play when at 10BB or less (which is a term rarely used in poker, but in this case GAME THEORY alone dictates correct and incorrect plays) is to shove the optimum hands to counter your opponents call/folding ranges, and call all-ins with optimum hands to counter your opponents shoving ranges. It is NOT shoving every hand, it is NOT bingo, it is NOT pure luck, no skill etc. etc. etc. its correct strategy based on ICM which you must adapt to your specific opponents tendancies.
For example, shoving 84suited is the correct play on the button with 10BB. The beautiful thing is, this shove is completely +EV and unexploitable. Thats the magic of game theory. Here's why:
Against the perfect opponent (as dictated by ICM), he will be calling with the optimum range (22,A2,K5,K2s,Q9,Q7s,JT,J8s,T9s), which he will have just rarely enough to make this shove profitable. +EV
Against a very loose opponent, his calling range will be much wider, and hence he will call you way too light, which will be -EV for him against your perfect shoving range (hence +EV for you)
Against a very tight opponent, his calling range will be much narrower, and hence he will hardly ever call you, which will be -EV for him against your perfect shoving range (hence +EV for you),
See - unexploitable - no ifs, ands or buts!
I guess this is all only valid if your opponent is also playing shove - fold poker, but chances are if they aren't, they are spewing chips by raise-folding a lot to your optimum shoves! Bling Blang Blaow. This is a very solid post now. Thing is bear. You talk about spew. I have seen you raise fold with 6bb. so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 541
Thanks: 6 times Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
connectorz wrote:Bling Blang Blaow. This is a very solid post now. Rub rub rub rub it on bear's tiiiiiitttttttiiiiiiies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 1 714
Thanks: 5 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
|
Wave a white flag is suitabel imo..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Moderators
Posts: 5 042
Thanks: 66 times Was thanked: 146 time(s) in 111 post(s)
|
well I feel silly now. I just read Brunsons Blog, and he told a story about how back in the day, this fella who called himself 'Bear' took almost $30,000 off him at HU sngs, $400 a pop. He said, and I quote; Doyle 'The Godfather of Poker' Brunson wrote:'Never have I played against someone who could slowly grind me down so slowly. He was methodical, it was uncanny, like a Fox with Scalpels for fingers. He was surgical. I on the other hand was like a struggling doctor, no patience. I started shoving on him but he just called me a donk and dodged my shoves like a ninja. He managed to outplay me postflop with 9bb, managing to bend the rules of poker by raising only a third of a big blind at a time. I couldn't do this myself, and he refused to tell me HOW he did it. Every match I would be ground down to one big blind, and then, only then would he call my shove, and he always had the bullets. This guy. Is a champion.'
|
|
1 user thanked connectorz for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 1 714
Thanks: 5 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
|
dabeear wrote: He then types a fabulous psyci comment in the chat box to sucker you in and you leapt at it like a salmon
That actually desourves the wall!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 702
Thanks: 32 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 21 post(s)
|
alright, let me just add my two cents to all this: firstly, the matter of "shoving preflop - good with 10BBs, bad with 11?" seriously, read all the posts again, you are basically all saying the same thing, you are constantly agreeing with one another, but making it look like you are adding new viewpoints to the whole discussion everytime. bottom line, blinds are rising faster than a 12-year-old's dick at a porno convention - there will be a lot of shoving going on. depending on how even the stacks are, it will either start at 50/100 or 75/150. maybe two people should each make a vid of their HU match against each other, so we can actually see when, how often and most importantly, with what cards they are shoving. and secondly, my HU match against connectorz. was their strategy involved posting those comments when i just flopped trip 9's? definitely (on a sidenote, i had no idea that match would get recorded). did i "outplay" you, calling you down with 58 early in the game? sure, why not. was it a mistake raising to 250 and repeatedly folding to your shove? of course. but let me add, not as an excuse, that i was absolutely card dead but didn't wanna back down on the agression as i just took over the chip lead. this match, as a lot of the other ones, was decided when both players had entered push-or-fold mode, which basically rendered every good move i may have made previously meaningless. if connectorz wins his 60/40 against my 10-7, it's over and nobody would've complained (certainly not me). as it happened, i got my more-or-less lucky double-up and picked up a decent hand shortly after and won it. this match for me was really interesting and fun, but certainly not one i would brag about to my friends, or one where i felt i had completely dominated my opponent. so fair game to connectorz for rigorously defending himself here, and cheers to beear for all the praise and criticism concerning my play, i do appreciate it. oh and: cunego wrote:The hand you wanted me to reply to was lie this: i got k6 or something on bb 50, sb bet to 125.. i go allin with 1,2k and he called.. i said good call with a bit of split opinion about it since it was my first reraise after about 25 -30 hands.. He was right obv, but i dont know if its worth the risk.. give me your oppinion.. 1. your super-loose style is widely known. 2. i've seen your 2 previous HU-matches and talked about them with my teammates 3. i raised your BB repeatedly, you kept folding, i knew you would shove back sooner or later with anything half-decent. as it happened, my timing was pretty good on that one (not saying i wouldn't've probably done the same thing with K6 in your position). in fairness i was getting a LOT of more than playable hands. okay i guess that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 541
Thanks: 6 times Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
slevin_bs wrote:you are basically all saying the same thing, you are constantly agreeing with one another .....yes, we all are agreed that shoving is the optimum play, and we each have given our reasons why. The only person I/we disagree with is Bear, it bothered me/us when he said there is zero skill, and we have all argued our case. slevin_bs wrote:"shoving preflop - good with 10BBs, bad with 11?" Not true. ICM tells us there are unexploitable shoves fo as much as 25BB, but I think 0-15BB is usually my zone to play shove fold. slevin_bs wrote:blinds are rising faster than a 12-year-old's dick at a porno convention ............lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 197
Thanks: 26 times Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
slevin_bs wrote:bottom line, blinds are rising faster than a 12-year-old's dick at a porno convention LAD!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 113
Thanks: 11 times Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
|
slevin_bs wrote:blinds are rising faster than a 12-year-old's dick at a porno convention there's been some amusing lines in this thread, but that ones gotta take the prize. always good to see a bit of infighting in team Lads! @PapaBear - yeah i remember that hand, yeah it was quite crucial. As i said at the time, I knew it was on raise too far at the time. I couldn't really mix up my play as much as I'd have liked against you, what with cooking/watching your vid/masturbating. haha! very enjoyable though, gg, good banter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 1 714
Thanks: 5 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
|
slevin_bs wrote:
1. your super-loose style is widely known. 2. i've seen your 2 previous HU-matches and talked about them with my teammates 3. i raised your BB repeatedly, you kept folding, i knew you would shove back sooner or later with anything half-decent. as it happened, my timing was pretty good on that one (not saying i wouldn't've probably done the same thing with K6 in your position). in fairness i was getting a LOT of more than playable hands.
okay i guess that's it.
Okey, I understand, i would probably not go allin with a better hand that yours too, would most likely prefer to play it, except for hands like a8-a10, but guess those are the only hands i would punt that i have you beat with.. But i now know that next time if a guy raiises small blind i will push my aces instead of just making a silly low reraise :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 702
Thanks: 32 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 21 post(s)
|
pokertuber wrote:.....yes, we all are agreed that shoving is the optimum play, and we each have given our reasons why. The only person I/we disagree with is Bear, it bothered me/us when he said there is zero skill, and we have all argued our case. dabeear wrote:Indeed shuvn with X number of BB is standard dabeear wrote:Of course thr is a valid reason for the shuv and trust me Cunego its down to what the level the blinds are at and obviously how many BB u have left. --> it's not like he's completely disagreeing with the rest of you. he's just slightly nittier than the rest of us. and if that's his style and it works for him, fair game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 1 021
Thanks: 7 times Was thanked: 50 time(s) in 38 post(s)
|
connectorz wrote:Oh, and god. Stop prattling on about these $300 sngs you played against Ivey and Brunson. There is no evidence they existed. They definitely no longer take place. And they do not give you an expert opinion on the matter. I am happy to discuss hands and situations with you, but you saying you played these sngs does not add your opinion one ounce of weight.
I was gunna write something along those lines, thought i'd check first. Right, no offense intended to the mighty bear, but my god, you seriously need to stop making out your better than everyone on this site because you've played at higher stakes. The fact you're, who knows, mid 40's, and the people you constantly bash, cunego, connectorz, anyone else, saying you've played higher stakes, you've lived twice as long as these people. I mean, go ahead, bring up that i dont know what im doing coz i havent played in 200nl cash games. im a student, and im more than happy with a 467% ROI playing donk filled $3 and $4 tournies. The fact you havent played these high cash games and large buyin tournies for so long doesnt seem to factor into your head. Nor the fact, you might have lost an insane amount of "knowledge" you had at those levels you played in a past life. You're no better than half the people on here, results prove it. So get out of your throne and give a bit more respect to peoples opinions and inputs instead of thinking you are the allknowing being. Because trust me, clearly you're not. /rant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 1 714
Thanks: 5 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
|
slevin_bs wrote:pokertuber wrote:.....yes, we all are agreed that shoving is the optimum play, and we each have given our reasons why. The only person I/we disagree with is Bear, it bothered me/us when he said there is zero skill, and we have all argued our case. dabeear wrote:Indeed shuvn with X number of BB is standard dabeear wrote:Of course thr is a valid reason for the shuv and trust me Cunego its down to what the level the blinds are at and obviously how many BB u have left. --> it's not like he's completely disagreeing with the rest of you. he's just slightly nittier than the rest of us. and if that's his style and it works for him, fair game. That is okey, but he said in the video that shovingplay removes skill! No it dont, its another strategy.. If you do the shoveplay bad you have less skill, if you do it good you got more skill.. The reason I posted this comment: "And Bear shoving allin pre dont remove skill, its another type of skill.. Shoving 1 million bb preflop to win 1 bb is bad a bad play, same with with 20bb+.. 10-20 bb shoves are marginals but they can be suitabel in some situations and holdings.. 10- bb is what is close to always a shove, that aint reduction of skill, it is the best strategy!" wasn't to tell him about shoveplaying, it was just to underline that it aint removing of skill, because thats just wrong! It was just that one comment I wanted him to agree to, but he gave me an answer of the strategy of shoving, which I wasnt after at that point..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Moderators
Posts: 5 042
Thanks: 66 times Was thanked: 146 time(s) in 111 post(s)
|
Quickly, Slevin, I want to quickly highlight at no point have I said anything detrimental about your performance or your game, I think you played very well, and you winning was hardly unfair. You played a solid game and beat me, I had no complaints really until bear told me that I got 'outplayed', repeatedly I hasten to add, and I just took offence to this. Maybe it was the tiredness, and believe you me, I was tired, but I got so annoyed on wednesday night with regards to... everything, and bear telling me I got outplayed when imo, I really wasn't, it was a fairly even game, was the icing on the cake.
However, hearing him go on a huge story telling escapade about how this was the case with ridiculous embellishment with regards to mind games etc. Well. He is too adamant about his opinion, on basic, common poker strategy. Seriously, like there can be any real postflop play with 14bb. It is at its best, raise, call ---> flop. Cbet/checkraise, and once thats done, you have almost critically damaged your stack and your at a huge disadvantage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 702
Thanks: 32 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 21 post(s)
|
connectorz wrote:at no point have I said anything detrimental about your performance or your game yeah, no worries, i took no offence at anything you said in this thread. maybe we'll get our rematch in the final round, maybe we won't. as the old german saying goes, 'don't divide the fur until the bear is slayed'. cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 65
|
@ Pokertuber - i agree with almost everythign you say mate but i am not talking about 10 BB here and lepparaise also makes that assumption. My reference was to when it was 14 BB thats like 40% more chips people and that does make a difference. Connectorz started the shuv war at 14BB after slevin took that mighty chuck outta his chip lead. And if you go back to the point I mention in the time zone on the video and replay it and take into account the change in game play you will hopefully see what I am saying.......... 14bb peeps not 10 was what I was refering to............
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 518 Location: Exeter England
Thanks: 38 times Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 24 post(s)
|
I'm assuming that's Bear's post ↑↑, why does it say 888poker? I'm confused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 541
Thanks: 6 times Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 518 Location: Exeter England
Thanks: 38 times Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 24 post(s)
|
pokertuber wrote:14BB = 10BB Now I'm even more confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Posts: 2 540
Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 29 post(s)
|
@ VividAAces - You 100% misunderstand what was meant by that post mate. It was in reference to the playing styles that change the higher the cash levels becomes. As one earlier poster correctly pointed out you do see less shuvn pre flop at lower stakes HU play and when you do play at higher levels you do see much more post flop pay manoevering..........
It was not meant to be any big headed comment it was meant to be a factual comment. And yes your right is has been several years since i have played those games and played at any decent level. Max I have been playing now is $2/$1 cash games and even then I can't get the time to do what I would like. Reason simple- I now have a family and a full time job that is demanding a huge amount from me. This makes Bear now a Hobby player. I would luv to be able to play more etc but time doesn't permit......
However, redundancy is looming next year and poor old bear will more than likely loose job next summer after 14 long hard years with same company !
So I might just get a chance to play a little more poker then - *smiles*
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|